Wednesday, 17 October 2012

Winchester Cathedral lighting up History


The history of Winchester is being re-told in the form of a multi-media musical.

The event manager Simon Barwood said “All the money raised will go towards buying an enhanced sound and lighting system for the Cathedral”.

Celebrities such as Dame Judi Dench, John Rhys-Davies and Alan Titchmarsh are all at Winchester Cathedral but in a more ghostly form – through a projector.

The Chronicles of Light will delve into the past of famous historical figures such as Jane Austen and St. Swithun; the event will run until the 28th of October.


Sunday, 14 October 2012

The search for truth

This blog post will mark my return to a constant flow of blogging (most probably :D) this will be mostly about the search for truth, which we are arguably many many many years from now until we know the full truth about something. Enjoy!

The search for truth: Science is the closest thing to a pure and accepted truth, despite the fact that the pursuit of science and knowledge has only clarified it in our minds that we are getting no closer to knowing a pure truth. This links in with paradigm shifts and how it was once universally believed that the world was flat and if you went to the edge it would be a waterfall that you could fall off of. Sounds sensible, right? The philosopher Kant believes that the real human condition is not mortality but instead to strive constantly for the absolute truth and to never find it.

Kant, Aristotle Bacon and Newton: Kant delves deeper into his argument of truth and how we know things by identifying two different types of “truth” these are:

Apriori – It is true by definition, you need no prior experience to know that a triangle has 3 sides; by looking you can tell.

Aposteriori – These are observations of the world that make facts, for example conducting surveys and so on.

Aristotle, Bacon and Newton all shared the belief that the world exists solely of things. They believed that for example if a tree falls in the woods then it still makes a sound regardless of if any is around to hear it because it is still a physical being even if we aren't perceiving it at that very moment, these objects are still physically there. This is linked in closely with Plato and his idea of forms and the Cave theory.

Bacon, Newton and other empiricists (known as mechanical materialists) thought that the cosmos is the sum total of many thing, some of the things are very small and remote, for example atoms or molecules and so therefore would be difficult to see, however they are still there as objects and have been there for ages without us ever being able to see them.

The idea of solipsism would be a main opposition to this theory insofar as the idea of solipsism is that everything is a dream, the only thing that is there or real is you and they say your life is just images in a dream that you have concocted. That is just wack.

From the ideas of Kant, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche we find the idea that to exist is not a predicate of any possible object, existence isn't “caused” by anything it is a needed precondition of perception or consciousness – this idea was a breakthrough during the scientific revolution.

Logic – Deduction vs. Induction. FIGHT: From Aristotle, we are brought about to the fight between deduction and induction. In the “Organon” this tells us that deduction preserves truth and respects authority above all else and this is perhaps the most characteristic idea of the Greco-Roman world; deduction depends on a series of indisputable axioms known to a group of philosopher Kings (Plato and his Republic) or known to a religious hierarchy of priests and this produced singular / particular truths from principles. An example of a pre-set deductive axiom would be all swans are white, this is a swan, you can see it is white. This is a very dogmatic view that does not allow for any inquiry or exceptions. The Organon and other scriptures at this time were seen as fact and no-one could say otherwise. Francis Bacon spoke out about how if an axiom is intrinsically false, then the whole thing is not true – for example with the swans, not all of them are white because black swans exist too. This means that if the deductive logic of an axiom is wrong it cannot be seen as fact.

Newton to EinsteinNewton’s laws of gravity state that the universe runs according to universal laws that are applied everywhere – you can find out everything with amalgamation of knowledge, for example every disease can be understood by constantly adding to the knowledge already gained – all things can be proven scientifically and Newtonian knowledge paved the way for such technological advancements as the steam age and so on.

The Vienna Circle 1922: This consisted of philosophers and this group of philosophers decided that they had to apply science to philosophy to find any kind of facts as philosophy by itself was just a waste of time and the way forward was science. The Verification principle, which was bore through the ideas of the logical positivists dictate that the way you verify something gives you the truth of any proposition – this means that if it cannot be verified then it cannot be claimed as true or false. However, Karl Popper stated that the verification principle itself cannot be verified as there is no way to actually verify it. Well I'm now at a loss as to how we find out if something is absolutely true – thanks a lot Karl.

Well there you have it, my notes on science and truths, hope you found is somewhat enlightening and enjoyed the post. If you read it that is, if not thanks for the views :)

Friday, 5 October 2012

Seminar Paper – The Rise of Science

The Rise of Science: The rise of science, otherwise known as the scientific revolution, took place in the early modern period, 17th century, following the Italian Renaissance where development in , physics, mathematics, biology and chemistry transformed views of society and nature. Historically, the rise of science began in Europe towards the end of the 16th century and continued well into the 18th century. Further along in the 18th century we come to what is known universally as the period of Enlightenment – however, the true start date of the scientific revolution are highly debated as people believe that the publications of Copernicus’s “On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres” and then the publication by Vesalius’s “On the Fabric of the Human Body” are what really set the rise of science in motion which were both published in 1543. The creation of science wouldn't have been possible without the profound insight of 4 great men – Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo and Newton.

Copernicus: Copernicus’s book “On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres” paved the way for modern astronomy. This is because his “heliocentric model”, with the Sun at the centre of the universe, demonstrated that the motions of celestial objects can be explained without putting Earth at rest in the centre of the universe. The heliocentric model depicts the earth and planets revolving around a stationary sun at the centre of the solar system. This theory was opposed by Geocentrism, which placed the Earth at the centre of the solar system. However, the idea of the earth and other planets revolving the sun had been the proposed thousands of years ago but received no real support from any of the ancient astronomers. Thanks to Copernicus’s additions to science in the 16th Century, he managed to invent a way to predict this movement through his full mathematical model of the heliocentric system; this really set the groundwork which ultimately leads to the rise of the scientific method.

Despite the profound impact of Copernican theory, there arose many problems – the most prominent of these is the absence of a Stellar Parallax. A Parallax is a difference in the position of an object viewed along two different lines of sight; therefore a stellar parallax is the effect of a difference in sight on distant stars. It is a way to measure on an interstellar scale, and it can be used to determine the distance of Earth to another star, however this only become possible in the 19th century and this was still only in the case of the nearest stars, making it almost impossible to measure accurately, without the help of a telescope.
           
Kepler: Kepler was one of the first important astronomers to adopt Copernicus’s heliocentric theory and he was highly influenced by Pythagorean theory. Kepler was a German mathematician and astronomer, and is named a key figure in the scientific revolution. His most influential work was published eponymously; this was called the laws of planetary motion. In terms of astronomy, Kepler's three laws of planetary motion had a highly profound impact on science and astronomy, with his three scientific laws describing orbital motion, detailing the motion of planets revolving around the sun.

The first of Kepler’s laws was that the planets move in ellipses – it was generally understood by all astronomers that all celestial motions are circular and these are called epicycles. Therefore this means that the orbit of every planet is an ellipsis with the sun at one time or another. The second law details the varying velocity of the planet at different points of its orbit – I believe this explains how much the planets would move around the sun in their orbit and at what speeds. The third law was very important as it detailed and compared the movements of different planets while the first two laws were all about individual planets which had a mathematical formula to work it out – for example Russell states that “if R is the average distance of a planet from the sun and T is the length of its year, then R3 divided by T2 is the same for all the different planets”.

Galileo: Galileo is viewed as the greatest of the founders of modern observational astronomy, the father of modern physics and the father of modern science, he was only matched in credibility possibly by Newton – he very important as an astronomer and maybe even as the founder of dynamics. His work about dynamics allowed him to discover acceleration and this is defined as a change in velocity. Galileo believed that everyone, if they were left alone would continue to move in a straight line with uniform velocity.

Galileo was the first to discover the law of falling bodies, which is tied in closely with acceleration states that when you are free falling, the acceleration is constant, but the effects of wind resistance would hinder you slightly and that regardless of how heavy, tall or small the body is – it will always fall at the same speed; the acceleration would not change because of these aspects; this could only be fully proved with the invention of the air pump in 1654. Before the profound insight of Galileo, it was generally agreed that if something was larger, then it would fall faster solely on that aspect of it being bigger.

Furthermore, he delved into the study of projectiles – it was generally thought that if an object was fired horizontally it would travel like that for a while and then fall vertically; now Galileo detailed that this would not be the case, he stated that the horizontal velocity would remain constant in accordance with the law of inertia but vertical velocity would be added which ties in with the law of falling bodies The law of inertia explained issues that before Galileo, the Copernican system was unable to confront, for example if you are at the top of a tower and dropped a stone it would fall at the foot of the tower not to the east or west, you would think that if the earth is rotating then  during the fall it should move a small amount. This does not happen because the stone would retain the velocity of rotation which at the time of being released is being shared with the rest of the earth’s surface.

Newton: Isaac Newton built upon all the groundwork towards this scientific revolution that had been put in place by the other three great theorists, the work put in by Copernicus, Kepler and Galileo had set the stage for Newton to shine. Newton details in his work the three laws of motion. The first law – if an object experiences no force, then its velocity is always going to be constant – for example if the object is in rest, its velocity will be 0, or if it moves in a straight line with constant speed  then its velocity is going to be above zero. The second law states that the acceleration of a body is similar and directly proportional of the remaining force, called F, acting on the body, is in the direction of the net force and is inversely proportional to the mass of the body. Finally, the third law explains that when a body exerts force on a second body, the second body will exert force at the same time on the first body; this means that the force of the two bodies is equal in magnitude and opposing in direction.

Newton’s most important work is called “The Principia” and this is generally deemed to be one of the most important scientific books ever written. This is stated because it is independently detailed to the specific physical laws the work successfully. Newton is also highly credited and esteemed as he managed to build the first practical reflecting telescope and developed a theory of colour purely by observing that a prism decomposes white light into the many colours that form the visible spectrum. Newton also worked on celestial mechanics, this concerned gravitation and its effect on the orbits of planets. Here he greatly referenced Kepler's three laws of planetary motion. And if that wasn't enough, he went one step further and also formulated a law of cooling and greatly studied the speed of sound.

Francis Bacon: Francis Bacon has been named the creator and pioneer of empiricism. His works established inductive methodologies for scientific inquiry, which is known famously as the scientific method. The scientific method is the idea that you must always start a new theory from scratch - you must protect yourself from ideas from the past that might influence your ideas – which means it has to be original and it is a means of discovering new knowledge and a process of understanding.

Francis Bacon’s most notable work is called the “Novum Organum” which translates to “new instrument” or “New Organon” and this is an allusion to Aristotle’s work called the Organon, which was his treatise on logic and syllogism. Bacon details a new system of logic he believes to be superior to the outdated use of syllogism, he believed that you had to use the simple method of reduction and use inductive reasoning to gain knowledge.

This 'New Organon' had 4 key themes, the first of these being that knowledge is the source of human power, so we must harness and navigate through all knowledge. Secondly, there must be a clear separation of science and religion, as mixing if caused too many problems in the past. Thirdly the idea "new knowledge" must be thought up from scratch - these ideas or general theories must be then tested to see if they can prove them, or more accurately in later years falsify them. And finally science is dynamic - you must always admit to failure when you encounter it as opposed to the archaic way of never admitting defeat or failure, this is the way that you learn.

Friday, 4 May 2012

Schopenhauer and Nietzsche - HCJ

Schopenhauer: Schopenhauer was a German philosopher and one of the great pessimists and he was known for his philosophical clarity. Schopenhauer's most influential work, The World as Will and Representation, claimed that the world is fundamentally what humans recognize in themselves as their will. His analysis of will led him to the conclusion that emotional, physical, and sexual desires can never be fully satisfied. He became a student at a University in 1809. There he studied metaphysics and he studied under a man who advised him to concentrate on Plato and Immanuel Kant, which is where he draws some of his influence from - Schopenhauer accepted Kant's double-aspect of the universe — the phenomenal (world of experience) and the noumenal (the true world, independent of experience).

Nietzsche: Friedrich Nietzsche was a German philosopher. He wrote critical texts on religion, philosophy and science. Nietzsche's influence comes notably from existentialism. His style and radical questioning of the value and objectivity of truth have resulted in much commentary and interpretation, mostly in the continental tradition. His key ideas include the death of God, perspectivism, the Ubermensch, and the will to power. Central to his philosophy is the idea of "life-affirmation", which involves an honest questioning of all ideas that drain life's expansive energies.

Nietzsche is renowned for saying that “god is dead” and that all that will follow this is violence – which in turn will lead to the end of mankind, Nietzsche also tries to find a “super-man” person. Nietzsche now shows his true pessimism about life, he says that there won’t be humans forever, so he believes that we will all die and that nothing we do matters at all, but he says this as a good thing... crazy right? In 1872 Nietzsche published his first book, The Birth of Tragedy. However, his colleagues expressed little enthusiasm for the work. He renamed his book “Hellenism and Pessimism”. Nietzsche criticises Schopenhauer and calls him a Nihilist – he believes that Christians are the worst, they merely wait for death when we have just one life, we must live it to the fullest and ensure we die with no regrets, he believes that the Ubermensch does not apologise for its actions and therefore has no regrets.

Well that’s all for now, just for my revision purposes really, plus my notes are sort of bare for these two which isn’t good! Anyway, more to come sometime soon, so...

Stay classy :) x

Reinvented Blog :)

So I thought that it’s about time my onyx-cceptable blog has its much needed makeover, with that in mind I think im going to post more about stuff that isn’t just my work (paha let’s see how long this will last), but yeah thats happening. Anyway! As you can see, my blog is now completely (somewhat) different, I initially thought that I needed lasers but before I married myself to the idea of it I stumbled across robots and rocket ships, two of the coolest things in the world, and they just seem like a perfect fit for my completely academic blog *cough*

Now that I’ve said I want to blog more for fun and not because I need to I can’t actually think of much to say, managed to get media essay done...? Revision makes me want to die? Just the usual really, but yeah I guess if anything I’m getting more into the swing of uni life again, especially after a whole month off of doing literally nothing around the house in sleepy little Kenilworth. I am pleased to note that things felt far more normal today as it marked our traditional trip to maccies, even though we didn’t even plan on going there, we weren’t even hungry... so good at this life business. So yeah, planning on getting my revision started and continued tomorrow up until the exam. Then its money saving mode im afraid, gotta make sure I don’t need to dip into my savings too much to afford going to Japan, though I’ll obvs be hitting up Bop, the greatest night out ever – which is a common known fact, just like how the park swings in Kenilworth are the best in the county, true story.

All I can think of right now, truth is im just so bored and I really can’t sleep so instead of reading Arbok (yeah thats right, Ekans-ee this going on for a long time) I thought hey why not get back into blogging? It’s a sad time when I need to be hideously bored to want to blog, but this’ll change in no time! Now I know you’ve loved reading this so im sorry it has to end, yeah I know devastating, but I’d like to announce that you’re all gonna be seeing a lot more of my blog nowadays, might be a bit Slowbro so deal with it.

I’ll Raichu another blog post soon x

Karl Marx - HCJ

Karl Marx: Marx was a German philosopher who had a profound impact upon the world, he was born 1818 in Germany, studied law, philosophy and then revolution, and he met his best friend, wingman and bro Friedrich Engels 1844 in Paris. Marxism came from Karl Marx and it is renowned as a conflict theory, which is the conflict between the social classes A conflict theory such as Marxism is somewhat useful to our understanding of society, however it tends to be too deterministic.

Marxists see society as divided solely by class – how the ruling class exploit the working class, Marxism is a structural perspective, so it analyses society as a whole system made up of different parts that all blend together. In opposition to functionalists, Marxists do not see the state and its policies as benefitting all of society. Marxists instead say the state represents the ruling class, and its social policies serve the interests of capitalism, not those of society as a whole. The state provides ideological legislation to mask capitalist exploitation. For example, the welfare state makes it seem that the system cares about the poor people in society. Moreover, a Marxist would say the state maintains the labour force for further exploitation, an example of this is the NHS – it serves capitalism by keeping people healthy enough to work. Most importantly, the state is a means of preventing revolution. Marxists say that to stop a revolution the state will introduce policies that only have the intention to keep the working class happy with their situation and position in society.

According to Marx, man is a productive animal; mankind creates the environment it inhabits, for example we all make our own clothes and so on. Marx believes in technological determinism, which is a teleological view (history has a purpose, it is going somewhere), his process comes from the Hegelian philosophy (history and dialectics), British empiricism (economics of Adam Smith) and the French Revolution (revolution is the very best way to achieve the overall goal of equality). Marx followed the scientific method, he believed that he was using the same methods as Darwin – researching every aspect of society in order to understand it, he did countless hours of research. He highly valued the idea of achieving change through violence and conflict – which is an idea from Hegel that he actually liked – and Marx believed wholeheartedly that is was always a case of poor (proletariat) vs. the rich (bourgeoisie).

Marx sought the explanation of the historical process between man and the physical world (material) and its existence, so therefore Marx’s theory is called dialectic materialism. In terms of alienation, Marx believed that capitalism alienates man from themselves and each other; this is very much akin of Rousseau because they both talk about capitalism placing too much emphasis on material things which in turn leads to avarice – money is seen as the most important thing.

Marx talks about the inevitable fall of capitalism, however I believe that the Marxist theory of capitalism’s inevitable collapse is not very realistic; only to some extent though. Marx himself, in his later work, looked into capitalism but this was more in terms of class conflict, division and exploitation. Marx defined class in accordance to economic power, with emphasis on where people stand in relation to the ownership of the ‘means of production’.

Marx believed that capitalism was creating a very noticeable gap between two large powers of people; the affluent Bourgeoisie and the exploited Proletariat. For Marx, the analysis of the class system provides a deep insight into historical understanding and it enables predictions to be made about the future of capitalism. This encouraged Marx insofar as it helped him feel he could comfortably predict that the fall of capitalism is inevitable and that heralding that we will revert into a classless and equal system of government, otherwise known as Communism, and prior to this the brief period called the Dictatorship of the Proletariat. Marx believes that this is to be achieved by a full scale revolution conducted by the proletariat against the bourgeoisie, this was because Marx believed that the proletariat would no longer accept being exploited; they would overthrow capitalism.

Marx feels that this revolution is inevitable; he portrays this certainty of revolution through explaining ‘surplus value’. Surplus value is a Marxist term that explains how the ruling class, in their striving for improvement in a capitalist society, will always have to make a profit at the expense of the proletariat; it is the value that is extracted from the labour of workers by the mechanism of capitalist exploitation. Capitalism’s quest for profit can only be achieved through paying the workers a lot less than the value of their labour. This overall makes capitalism very unstable, though it is still debated whether or not the subordinate class would ever rise up as the working class are more than alright with continuing with their routines.

Stay classy :) x

The Dreyfus Affair - HCJ

I think it’s about time I start blogging again, I cannot  believe it’s taken me this long to blog up these notes, I suppose it will help towards revision, however, the Dreyfus affair will be my big (mediocre) return to the stage... It’s kind of a stage alright, jeeze way to rub that one in. Enjoy!

Background information: Picture it, The Franco-Prussian war and the growing influence of Prussia under Bismarck who tried to unify Germany, they tempted Napoleon III into war by using media propaganda and by provoking them – they essentially humiliated the French into war, without any allies.

1871 – France suffered a savage defeat and their leader, Napoleon was captured this was a very humiliating for the French as they were very proud of their army. While all other places in France fell, Paris is the only one to resist and would not surrender. Paris eventually fell in the siege of Paris to the Germans/Prussians. There were roughly two million odd people in Paris at this time and they were surrounded by German forces, they had a massive problem feeding people and so if it wasn’t enough already the French people left had to live off scraps from the trash and they even broke into the Zoo and eat any animals they could find, the Germans really wanted to prove their dominance it would seem and they definitely succeeded. Furthermore, the people in Paris tried to reach out to other places but to no avail.

The Paris Commune: The people of Paris eventually gave in and the land lords started to return to Paris and began to charge the poor people rent and interest – the new government had a majority of royalists who wanted to restore the monarchy. The people didn't want to have a monarchy because they didn’t want a repeat of Napoleon III’s actions or to be charged while they had to suffer and so they rose up and this is what is known as the Paris commune, it was essentially what Marx spoke about – the dictatorship of the proletariat.

The commune was established March 18th – May 28th 1871 – Lenin called it the ‘festival of the oppressed’, the people who joined the commune were radicals, they were highly socialist, Marxist and anarchists, furthermore, women played an important role in the commune and they were highly influential. The Commune introduced social reform, nurseries so women could work and so on and they also improved working conditions (so no night shifts). However, this was short lived because the commune was pretty much obliterated in a cruelest way possible, thousands of people were executed, women, children and men all killed for being part of the commune.

The Dreyfus Affair: Even thought the defeat of France in the Franco-Prussian war in 1871 was still lingering, France managed to rebuild and consolidate its safety but when this happened they randomly started hating bad on Jewish people in France - blaming them for all the problems that France had encountered as they were seen as the "money people" (good job France) this all flourished from politicians being bribed to stay quiet about company's financial problems, these bribes were organised by two Jewish people and this is believed to be what sparked off anti-Semitism in France.

The Dreyfus Affair was a political scandal that divided France in the 1890s and the early 1900s. It involved the conviction for treason in November 1894 of Captain Alfred Dreyfus, a young French artillery officer of Jewish descent. He was sentenced to life imprisonment for allegedly having communicated French military secrets to the German Embassy in Paris, Dreyfus on trail for a Court Martial and they found him guilty of treason and sent him to Devil's Island for almost 5 years. They looked into the evidence of this case some time down the road and found it to be wrong, the real culprit who leaked military secrets was a man called Esterhazy - however the superiors decided to leave it alone, they would better to blame it on a Jew (just cause everyone was now doing it... followers) than have the French military be hilariously humiliated yet again. However, they put Esterhazy on trial in a military court but he was found innocent, this lead to the famous French Journalist, Emile Zola to write his article "J'accuse". This article accused the government of anti-Semitism and the unlawful jailing of Alfred Dreyfus. He pointed out errors and lack of evidence. The letter was printed on the front page of the newspaper, and was very controversial. Zola was prosecuted and found guilty of libel so he fled to England.

That's all for now friends, however I have many more blog posts to catch up on, just as well its before my exam as well cause lord knows I could do with the revision :)

Stay classy, Winchester x (I've missed saying that)